SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PERSONAL DATA OFFENCES

نویسندگان

چکیده

Рассматривается проблема социальной обусловленности уголовноправового запрета посягательств в отношении персональных данных человека. Объектом исследования являются общественные отношения, возникающие связи с установлением уголовной ответственности за нарушения неприкосновенности человека, а его целью ± выявление оснований их уголовноправовой охраны. Для достижения указанной цели применялись формально-юридический, системно-структурный методы юридической науки. Автор развивает и углубляет теорию части социально-правового криминологического обоснования криминализации рассматриваемых деяний. Делается вывод об обоснованности уголовно-правовой охраны высокими рисками «деаномизациидля фундаментальных прав The problem of social conditionality the criminal law prohibition encroachments against personal data a person is being considered. object study relations arising in connection with establishment liability for violations inviolability person, and its purpose to identify grounds their protection. For this purpose, formal-legal, system-structural methods legal science were used. author develops deepens theory terms socio-legal criminological justification criminalization crimes question. It concluded that protection justified high risks «deanomizationfor fundamental human rights.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Positive Interaction of Social Comparison and Personal Responsibility for Outcomes

We formulate and test a model that allows sharp separation between two different ways in which environment affects evaluation of outcomes, by comparing social vs. private and personal responsibility vs. chance. In the experiment, subjects chose between two lotteries, one low-risk and one high-risk. They could then observe the outcomes. By varying the environment between private (they could obse...

متن کامل

CHR for Social Responsibility

Publicly traded corporations often operate against the public’s interest, serving a very limited group of stakeholders. This is counter-intuitive, since the public as a whole owns these corporations through direct investment in the stock-market, as well as indirect investment in mutual, index, and pension funds. Interestingly, the public’s role in the proxy voting process, which allows sharehol...

متن کامل

Drug Addiction and Personal Responsibility

This project examines drug addiction and personal responsibility from the perspective of three different types of theories of addiction: full responsibility, diminished responsibility, and no responsibility. The rational theory of addiction is the fully responsibility theory. The philosophical insights by R. Jay Wallace and George Graham are the diminished responsibility theories. Berridge and ...

متن کامل

Corporate Social Responsibility for Irresponsibility

This paper provides an empirical investigation of the hypothesis that companies engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) in order to offset corporate social irresponsibility (CSI). We find general support for the relationship that when companies do more “harm,” they also do more “good.” The empirical analysis is based on an extensive 15-year panel dataset that covers nearly 3,000 publicl...

متن کامل

Market for Corporate Social Responsibility

Much is expected of the modern corporation. Shareholders seeking to maximize their return on investment pay close attention to reported earnings and stock price appreciation. Unanticipated negative movements in these variables can give rise to shareholder agitation, amplified by hedge funds and activist pension funds. Although this is characteristic of the Anglo-American ‘market for corporate c...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1995-0152']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26456/vtpravo/2022.3.141